Here are 5 keys to success in outsourcing/offshoring - proven tips that are universally applicable to most outsourcing engagements:
1. Accountability - Be willing to relinquish control , trust and delegate responsibility to vendor but know that you're as accountable for the final quality of services as the vendor.
- Clients should be willing to 'let go' and put the onus on the vendor to deliver.
- Know that the IT leads are finally accountable for the services to the IT customers puts emphasis on trusting and delegating but staying engaged enough to stay on top of the situation.
- Don't micro-manage. You don't want to pay the premium for a top-tier vendor and treat them like a tier-3 staffing group. Not good for your goals, not good for the motivation of your suppliers. Motivate them to take ownership and be a solution provider than a transactional service provider
How does one achieve this level of alignment between customer and vendor? How can a client lead effectively manage the quality without getting into the trenches? How does one strike the balance? All these are questions that will translate into the other following best practices.
- Clients should be willing to 'let go' and put the onus on the vendor to deliver.
- Know that the IT leads are finally accountable for the services to the IT customers puts emphasis on trusting and delegating but staying engaged enough to stay on top of the situation.
- Don't micro-manage. You don't want to pay the premium for a top-tier vendor and treat them like a tier-3 staffing group. Not good for your goals, not good for the motivation of your suppliers. Motivate them to take ownership and be a solution provider than a transactional service provider
How does one achieve this level of alignment between customer and vendor? How can a client lead effectively manage the quality without getting into the trenches? How does one strike the balance? All these are questions that will translate into the other following best practices.
2. Process over People
The key is for the customer to be managing their partners to the input and output
- Robust processes provide the ability to independently verify and monitor
-There is a propensity to attribute all issues and success to 'people'. People come and go but processes live and deliver.
- When people leave, you lose tribal knowledge and special capabilities. That's where processes come in. They give you predictability and repeatability and make the operations people independent (to the extent possible)
- The strength of the processes is a true measure of the risk management in the engagement.
3. Tool based process and reporting
- Reporting needs to be objective. Have a single source of data- traceable, centralized, and transparent
- The reports need to be generated from 'actual data' that flows through processes and tools that ensure the accuracy of the data . Anytime anyone needs to monitor the health of a process or system, one needs to be able to access an objective and transparent report from a reliable tool that manages that process
- If there are contentions with the data, one should be able to audit and trace the data easily
Data and metrics should aid conflict resolution not become a bone of contention. The best way to achieve this is through strong processes and integrated tools.
4. Knowledge Management
In a market where loyalty lasts as long as a hotdog on the Pink's stands, prepare for unplanned people movement. The best time to prepare for rainy days is when the sun is out, but it's never too late to patch the roof.- Having a centralized engagement portal with a knowledge repository is a worthy investment
- Make it a way of life for people to keep documentation up-to-date and save it centrally
- Host forums for cross-functional knowledge sharing between different groups
Something about the human brain relishes SILOes. Let's break it shall we...
5. Partner not Vendor
Finally, we expect the vendors to take accountability, invest in the relationship, go the extra mile when we need them to and basically act as partners. The question is do we treat them as one?
It's very common to see the us vs them attitude on both sides at the start of the engagement. It's the prerogative of the leadership to nip it in the bud and set a culture by which both the customer and vendor are aligned to the same goals and one cannot be successful at the expense of the other.
Each of these topics can and has spawned off many books dedicated to them, so there's no dearth of recommendations and best practices there. As I mentioned at the beginning of this article, it just boils down to reminding and re-assessing ourselves on the basics and keep it simple.
Finally, we expect the vendors to take accountability, invest in the relationship, go the extra mile when we need them to and basically act as partners. The question is do we treat them as one?
It's very common to see the us vs them attitude on both sides at the start of the engagement. It's the prerogative of the leadership to nip it in the bud and set a culture by which both the customer and vendor are aligned to the same goals and one cannot be successful at the expense of the other.
Each of these topics can and has spawned off many books dedicated to them, so there's no dearth of recommendations and best practices there. As I mentioned at the beginning of this article, it just boils down to reminding and re-assessing ourselves on the basics and keep it simple.